Illinois License Act topic guide
Illinois real estate advertising
A property advertisement can be truthful about the home and still mislead readers about the brokerage behind it. Check both the message and the identity of the business. Illinois also distinguishes a property post, a solicitation for services and the first digital message in a licensed transaction.
Last reviewed:
The short answer
Illinois real estate advertising must be truthful and understandable as a whole and identify the responsible sponsoring broker under the applicable rules. Name-size tests have alternatives. Digital property posts, service advertisements and initial electronic communications have different disclosures. A qualified by-owner exception changes the requirements; it does not permit anonymous or misleading advertising.
Reviewed October 24, 2026. Advertising is Illinois II.B in the June 24, 2026 PSI broker outline. The whole Illinois Real Estate License Act area accounts for 16 of 40 scored state questions; that is not an advertising-only quota. This guide applies the current Act and adopted rules, including the July 7, 2025 advertising-rule amendment. It does not audit every platform, MLS agreement or federal communications requirement.
Check the message, the brokerage and the medium
- Read the advertisement as an ordinary consumer would. Section 10-30 requires accurate, direct, readily comprehensible information and prohibits fraudulent, deceptive and misleading advertising. A misleading headline, image or overall impression is not cured simply because another sentence is technically true. The rules cover more than paid ads: unsolicited marketing of licensed activities and prospecting are advertising too.
- Find the complete sponsoring-broker identity. The business name is the licensed name or registered assumed name; a franchise includes the franchise affiliation and individual firm. A team brand or an unnamed symbol does not identify the sponsoring broker. A sponsoring broker does not have to put every sponsored licensee on the brokerage's own signs or advertisements.
- Apply the actual size alternatives. Rule 1450.715(b) recognizes any one of three tests: sponsoring-broker lettering at least as large as the individual or team lettering; an area containing the sponsoring-broker name at least as large in height and width; or a qualifying logo or similar identification incorporating that name at least as large. These are alternatives, not three cumulative hurdles. A symbol without the name does not qualify as the name-containing logo.
- Check team wording and professional titles separately. Terms such as realty, real estate, company, agency, associates, brokers, properties and property are inherently misleading in a team name unless followed by team. That wording does not waive sponsoring-broker identification or truthful presentation. A designated managing broker must identify that status in advertising that includes their name, except on For Sale or similar signs on real property. A managing broker who is not the designated managing broker cannot claim the latter role.
- Identify which digital rule applies. Rule 1450.720 separates property marketing, services marketing and initial electronic communication. A sponsored licensee's property advertisement must carry the required information at its electronic location, including property location, the permitted individual or team identity, the sponsoring broker and office information. If the licensee lacks a license in the property's jurisdiction, disclose the jurisdictions where the licensee is licensed; that disclosure does not itself grant authority to practice elsewhere.
- Treat links precisely. The Act's blind-ad definition recognizes a qualifying direct electronic disclosure link, and Rule 1450.720(j) requires direct links to the specified business disclosures and offer or inducement terms. Neither is a blanket waiver of the other applicable advertising or initial-message rules. Linking to another location's listing information has its own rule; copying its photos or description into a new advertisement is a different act.
- Check authorization and continuing accuracy. Advertising another sponsoring broker's exclusive listing requires permission and identification of that broker. Do not scrape or republish another licensee's listing content without the required permission and disclosure. Periodically review digital advertising. Remove stale listed-property advertising within a reasonable time after closing or listing expiration or termination, whichever occurs first, considering the medium, control, ease of removal, knowledge and other relevant facts.
- Apply the right ownership and fair-housing rules. A broker marketing an ownership interest through a brokerage and a qualifying sponsored or inactive licensee selling by owner have different advertising disclosures. License status and an interest in the transaction still require the applicable written disclosure to the parties. Avoid discriminatory preferences and deceptive promises; a fair-housing logo or an asserted owner exemption does not make prohibited wording lawful.
| Communication | Required identity and location information | Important distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsoring broker: property marketing, .720(b) | Sponsoring-broker name; property city/geographic area and state/country; registered office city/state or specified direct link; licensed jurisdictions if not licensed where property lies | Another broker's exclusive listing also needs permission and identification |
| Sponsoring broker: services marketing, .720(c) | Sponsoring-broker name; registered principal/other office city/state or specified direct link | Property-location information is a property-ad requirement, not an invented location for a general service |
| Sponsored licensee: property marketing, .720(d) | Licensed/registered individual name or permitted team substitute; property location; sponsoring-broker name; office city/state or virtual-office direct link; licensed jurisdictions if applicable | Required information belongs at the electronic location where the advertisement appears |
| Sponsored licensee: services marketing, .720(e) | Licensed/registered individual name or permitted team substitute; sponsoring-broker name; office city/state or virtual-office direct link | Team substitution here does not carry over to every initial communication |
| Sponsoring broker: initial digital communication, .720(f) | Sponsoring-broker name; registered office city/state or specified virtual-office direct link | Applies to the initial licensed-activity communication with the public or another licensee |
| Sponsored licensee: initial digital communication, .720(g) | Licensed/registered individual name; sponsoring-broker name; office city/state or virtual-office direct link | A team name may be added; it does not replace the individual name here |
The distinctions that matter
| Distinction | How it works | What to notice |
|---|---|---|
| A qualifying logo vs. a symbol alone | The logo-size alternative must incorporate the sponsoring broker's actual name. A large abstract symbol without that name does not qualify. | Read what the logo says, not just how large it is. |
| Team substitution vs. team addition | A team name can substitute for the individual name under .720(d) and (e). Under .720(g), it may be used in addition to the individual name. | A property post and the first transaction message are different. |
| A listing link vs. a copied advertisement | Under .720(h), linking to listing information at another location generally needs no approval unless that location's owner specifically requires consent. The link must not mislead about ownership. Copying and reposting content invokes other permission and disclosure rules. | A hyperlink is not a license to republish. |
| Public listing content vs. gated listing information | Rule .715(c) excludes specified listing information behind a firewall, password, registration or similar security clearance for .715 and .720 purposes. It is not a general exemption for every private solicitation or digital message. | The exception describes listing information, not all private activity. |
| A handle alone vs. deceptive use | A domain, URL, username or social handle alone is not advertising under .720(k). Deceptive traffic diversion, phishing or misleading use can still violate the Act and .715. | Classification does not excuse deception. |
| Brokerage marketing vs. qualified by-owner advertising | Section 10-30(c)(1) addresses a broker advertising an ownership interest through the brokerage. Section (c)(2) supplies a different exception for a qualifying sponsored or inactive licensee acting by owner without brokerage services. | Establish the route before choosing the disclosure. |
| Transaction exemption vs. discriminatory publication | The private single-family sale and small owner-occupied apartment exemptions in Section 3-106(A) and (B) do not exempt prohibited publication under Section 3-102(F). | An owner's claimed exemption does not approve the advertisement. |
Work through the facts
Small separate lettering, but a qualifying logo
An individual's name uses larger lettering than a separate line of brokerage text. The advertisement also contains a logo incorporating the complete sponsoring-broker name that is at least as large as the individual name. All other requirements are satisfied.
- The font-size alternative is not the only test.
- The facts expressly satisfy the name-containing-logo alternative.
- No unnamed symbol is being substituted for the business name.
Answer: The size requirement is satisfied on these facts; all three tests need not be met.
A team-only first message
A sponsored licensee sends the first digital communication about licensed services to another broker. It states the team, sponsoring broker and required office information, but omits the individual's licensed or registered name.
- Rule .720(g) applies to the initial communication, including to another licensee.
- It permits the team name in addition to the individual name.
- The separate permission to substitute a team name in certain advertisements does not cure this omission.
Answer: Include the individual's licensed or registered name.
A link is not a scraped listing
A broker links to listing information at another electronic location. The location's owner has not required consent, and the link accurately identifies the source without implying ownership of the listing.
- Rule .720(h) addresses this linking situation.
- The stated facts meet its no-approval-needed condition and do not mislead.
- Copying the listing into a new advertisement would require a separate analysis.
Answer: The link does not need approval under the stated .720(h) facts.
Permission without identification
A broker has permission to advertise another sponsoring broker's exclusive listing, but the new advertisement does not identify that listing broker.
- Permission and identification are separate requirements.
- Authorization alone does not tell the consumer who holds the listing.
- Rule .715(a)(1) and .720(b)(2) address the distinction.
Answer: Identify the sponsoring broker with the exclusive listing.
An old video remains live
A controlled social-media video continues to market a listed home after the listing has terminated. The licensee knows it is live and can readily remove it.
- The rule asks about reasonable removal time and relevant circumstances.
- Control, ease of removal and knowledge matter.
- There is no universal 24-hour deadline supplied by this advertising rule.
Answer: Take appropriate removal or correction action within the reasonable-time standard; accuracy at the original posting is insufficient.
An inactive licensee sells by owner
An inactive Illinois licensee sells qualifying solely owned property by owner, without brokerage services. The sign and online advertisement omit all reference to the owner's license status.
- Section 10-30(c)(2) expressly reaches inactive licensees.
- The qualified exception changes brokerage participation, not the required broker owned or agent owned disclosure.
- The applicable written transaction-party disclosure remains a separate duty.
Answer: Use broker owned or agent owned on the sign and in all other advertising media, without suggesting an uninvolved brokerage represents the sale.
Joint ownership is not automatically outside the exception
A sponsored licensee holds the property as a joint tenant and otherwise meets the by-owner exception's stated conditions. A practice answer says the exception can apply only to a person holding 100% alone.
- Section 10-30(c)(2) gives solely owned a specific meaning for this provision.
- It includes the stated joint-tenancy and tenancy-by-the-entirety situations.
- That advertising definition does not resolve authority to convey another owner's interest.
Answer: Reject the 100%-alone-only answer; apply the special statutory definition and remaining conditions.
A housing logo beside a prohibited preference
An Illinois owner-occupied four-unit rental advertisement excludes applicants because of source of income. The advertiser adds a fair-housing logo and invokes the small-building exemption.
- Section 3-102(F) addresses prohibited discriminatory publication.
- Section 3-106(B) expressly preserves paragraph (F).
- The logo does not change the exclusion stated in the advertisement.
Answer: The asserted small-building exemption and logo do not authorize the prohibited publication.
Consumer information will be shared
A licensee's website gathers prospective-client information and the licensee intends to sell or share it. The plan is not disclosed in a timely, readily apparent way.
- Section 10-35(a) specifically addresses that intention.
- It covers information gathered through the Internet and other electronic communication media.
- Correct brokerage branding does not cure the omitted consumer-data disclosure.
Answer: Make the required intention disclosure timely and readily apparent.
Mistakes to avoid
- Every ordinary personal post is automatically a real estate advertisement. Identify property marketing, licensed-services solicitation, prospecting or another applicable advertising activity; do not invent a rule covering every unrelated personal message.
- The brokerage must pass all three size tests. The rule states alternatives. A qualifying name-containing logo can satisfy its test even when separate lettering does not satisfy another.
- A link in the bio excuses every omitted disclosure. Apply the blind-ad definition and the actual property, services, initial-communication and direct-link requirements together.
- Adding team cures any misleading company presentation. The stated team-name wording rule is only one requirement. Sponsoring-broker identification and the overall consumer impression still matter.
- Broker owned means the brokerage must be participating. It discloses licensee ownership; qualified by-owner advertising must not suggest an uninvolved sponsoring broker represents the transaction.
- The owner may say anything because the transaction is exempt. The stated private-sale and small-apartment exemptions preserve the prohibition on discriminatory publication.
Check your understanding
These are original teaching questions, not recalled or predicted PSI questions. Answer first, then explain why the other choices fail.
1. A name-containing sponsoring-broker logo meets the size alternative in .715(b)(2)(C), but separate brokerage lettering is smaller than the individual name. Other requirements are met. Which answer is best?
- A team name eliminates the size requirement.
- The stated logo alternative satisfies the size requirement.
- Any symbol qualifies even without the broker name.
- The ad fails because every size test is mandatory.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The stated logo alternative satisfies the size requirement.
The rule provides alternatives, and the facts satisfy the qualifying-logo test. All tests are not cumulative. A nameless symbol and a team brand do not replace the sponsoring-broker name or remove the requirement.
2. A sponsored licensee sends the initial digital licensed-activity message to another licensee. Which name rule applies under .720(g)?
- Include the individual licensed or registered name; a team name may be added.
- No identity is needed when writing to another licensee.
- Only the team name is ever required.
- A social-media handle always replaces both individual and sponsoring-broker names.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Include the individual licensed or registered name; a team name may be added.
Rule .720(g) covers the initial communication with the public or another licensee. It requires the individual name and permits the team in addition, along with the sponsoring broker and required office information. The advertisement substitution provisions do not apply indiscriminately.
3. A nonmisleading link points to listing information elsewhere. That location's owner has not required consent. What does .720(h) provide?
- The link automatically permits copying all photos into a new advertisement.
- All listing links are prohibited.
- The source can be concealed because the link is technically functional.
- Approval is not required for the stated link.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Approval is not required for the stated link.
The rule permits the stated link without approval unless the location owner specifically requires consent. It must not mislead about ownership. It neither bans every link nor grants an unrestricted republication right.
4. A broker obtains permission to advertise another sponsoring broker's exclusive listing but omits that listing broker's identity. What is missing?
- Identification of the sponsoring broker holding the exclusive listing.
- A universal 24-hour publication delay.
- A requirement to show all sponsored licensees.
- A guaranteed sale date.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Identification of the sponsoring broker holding the exclusive listing.
Permission and identification are both required in the described advertisement. None of the other choices supplies the missing disclosure; the rules do not impose the invented guarantee, all-licensee roster or universal delay.
5. A controlled listing advertisement remains live after termination. What standard governs removal under .715(a)(3)?
- Exactly 24 hours in every medium.
- Only removal after the owner submits a new written demand.
- A reasonable time considering the medium, control, ease of removal, knowledge and other pertinent facts.
- No removal because the original advertisement was accurate.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. A reasonable time considering the medium, control, ease of removal, knowledge and other pertinent facts.
The rule specifies a reasonable-time standard after closing or listing expiration or termination, whichever occurs first. It supplies relevant circumstances, not a universal 24-hour clock or an owner-demand prerequisite. Original accuracy does not justify indefinite stale marketing.
6. An inactive licensee otherwise qualifies to sell solely owned property by owner without brokerage services. What must the sign and other advertising media disclose?
- Nothing, because inactivity removes the disclosure.
- The sponsoring broker's participation, even when it is uninvolved.
- Only the individual's phone number.
- Broker owned or agent owned.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Broker owned or agent owned.
Section 10-30(c)(2) includes inactive licensees and requires broker owned or agent owned on the by-owner sign and in all other advertising media. It does not authorize a false suggestion that an uninvolved brokerage represents the sale.
7. For Section 10-30(c)(2), which answer correctly describes the special solely owned definition?
- It includes the stated joint-tenant and tenancy-by-the-entirety situations, subject to the exception's other conditions.
- It automatically makes any tenant-in-common interest qualify.
- It allows one owner to convey every other owner's interest.
- It excludes every form of co-ownership.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. It includes the stated joint-tenant and tenancy-by-the-entirety situations, subject to the exception's other conditions.
The provision expressly includes its stated joint-tenancy and entirety situations as well as the other defined ownership cases. It does not include every co-ownership arrangement or decide conveyancing authority. The remaining by-owner conditions and disclosures still apply.
8. An owner-occupied four-unit rental advertisement states a prohibited source-of-income preference. The advertiser relies on Section 3-106(B). Which answer is best?
- The exemption permits any discriminatory advertisement.
- The exemption expressly does not remove Section 3-102(F)'s publication prohibition.
- A fair-housing logo cures the stated exclusion.
- No advertising law applies to an owner.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The exemption expressly does not remove Section 3-102(F)'s publication prohibition.
The small owner-occupied apartment exemption preserves paragraph (F). A prohibited published preference is not authorized by the claimed exemption or a logo, and the publication provision reaches owners and other persons as stated.
9. A licensee intends to sell or share consumer information collected online. What does Section 10-35(a) require?
- A guarantee that every lead will become a client.
- A timely and readily apparent disclosure of that intention.
- Disclosure only if a transaction closes.
- No disclosure if the brokerage name is prominent.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. A timely and readily apparent disclosure of that intention.
The intention to sell or share the gathered consumer information triggers the stated disclosure requirement. Closing, correct name size and a client-conversion promise do not replace it. Other privacy or communications duties may need separate analysis.
10. Which statement correctly combines .720(k) with the separate deceptive-use prohibitions?
- A handle alone is not advertising, but deceptive use to divert traffic can still be prohibited.
- A handle alone is never subject to any legal limit.
- Every domain name alone is a complete advertisement.
- A deceptive URL becomes lawful if it contains the word team.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. A handle alone is not advertising, but deceptive use to divert traffic can still be prohibited.
The identifier-alone classification does not override the prohibitions on deceptive URLs, phishing or misleading traffic diversion. Neither a blanket advertising classification nor unlimited immunity follows, and team wording does not cure deception.
Common questions
What must Illinois real estate advertising include?
Start with truthful, direct, understandable presentation and the responsible sponsoring-broker identity, subject to the specific statutory exceptions. Then apply the relevant medium and activity rules. A property advertisement, a general service solicitation and an initial digital transaction message have different additional requirements. Use the comparison table to identify the applicable subsection.
Does the brokerage name always need the largest font?
Rule 1450.715(b) provides three alternative compliance tests involving lettering, the height-and-width area containing the name, or qualifying identification such as a logo incorporating the sponsoring-broker name. Meeting one stated test satisfies that size provision. Do not reduce the rule to font size alone, require all three tests or count a nameless symbol as a name-containing logo.
What is an Illinois blind advertisement?
Section 1-10 defines it by missing complete sponsoring-broker identification or, for an electronic advertisement, failure to provide the stated direct link to a display with all required disclosures. A franchise business identity includes both franchise affiliation and individual firm. Read this definition together with the specific advertising rules; it does not make any generic profile link a universal cure.
Can a team use realty, properties or company in its name?
Rule .715(a)(2) identifies inherently misleading terms, including company, realty, real estate, agency, associates, brokers, properties and property, unless the term is followed by team. Complying with that wording rule does not eliminate brokerage identification, size or truthfulness requirements. A team is not a separately organized legal entity under the Act's definition.
Can a team name replace the individual name on social media?
Under .720(d) and (e), a team name may substitute for the licensed or registered individual name in the described property or services advertising. Under .720(g), the initial digital licensed-activity communication must include the individual name, and the team may be added. Do not apply the substitution rule to every first message.
What belongs in a sponsored licensee's digital property advertisement?
At the electronic location where it appears, include the licensed or registered individual name or permitted team substitute, the property's city or geographic area and state or country, sponsoring-broker name, and registered office city and state or the specified virtual-office direct link. If the licensee is not licensed where the property is located, include the jurisdictions where the licensee is licensed. That last disclosure does not itself authorize out-of-jurisdiction practice.
What belongs in the first electronic message about licensed activities?
Rule .720(g) requires the individual licensed or registered name, sponsoring-broker name, and registered physical-office city and state or specified virtual-office direct link. The team name may be added. The rule reaches the initial communication with another licensee as well as a member of the public. Section .720(f) separately states the sponsoring broker's initial-communication requirements.
Is a brokerage link in my bio enough for every post or message?
Do not assume that. The statutory blind-ad definition and .720(j) recognize specified direct disclosure links, while .715 and .720 also impose their particular identity, size, property-location and initial-communication requirements. Section .720(j) also addresses direct access to all terms of the described offers or inducements. This guide does not certify a particular platform layout or promise that any bio link satisfies every provision. A path that does not lead directly to the required disclosure display is not the qualifying direct link described in the definition.
Can I share another brokerage's listing?
Separate linking from creating a new advertisement. Rule .720(h) generally permits a nonmisleading link to listing information elsewhere without approval unless the location owner specifically requires consent. Advertising another sponsoring broker's exclusive listing requires permission and identification of that broker. Scraping or copying listing content invokes the separate permission and disclosure rules; a working hyperlink does not license unrestricted republication.
How quickly must an old listing advertisement be removed?
Rule .715(a)(3) uses a reasonable-time standard after closing or expiration or termination of the listing agreement, whichever occurs first. It considers the advertising medium, the licensee's control, ease of removal, knowledge and other pertinent criteria. Section .720(i) also requires periodic review and necessary updating of digital advertising. Do not invent a universal 24-hour deadline.
Are private websites and social handles exempt?
The rules make limited distinctions. Specified listing information behind a firewall, password, registration or similar security clearance is excluded for .715 and .720 purposes. A domain, URL, username or handle alone is not advertising under .720(k). Those statements do not exempt all private solicitations or allow deceptive URLs, phishing, unauthorized framing or misleading traffic diversion.
Does a broker advertising an ownership interest need broker owned on the advertisement itself?
Section 10-30(c)(1) does not require that disclosure on the brokerage advertisement itself in the situation it describes. It requires disclosure on property data forms accessible to consumers or to anyone responding to the advertisement. The applicable written disclosure to transaction parties is separate. Do not confuse this brokerage route with the by-owner exception in subsection (c)(2).
What is required when a sponsored or inactive licensee sells by owner?
For the qualified Section 10-30(c)(2) route, the property must meet that subsection's solely owned definition and brokerage services must not be used. The by-owner sign and all other advertising media must say broker owned or agent owned. The licensee must not suggest that an uninvolved sponsoring brokerage represents the sale, and purchase or lease solicitation advertising must disclose license status as provided. Applicable written transaction-party disclosures remain necessary.
Does solely owned mean only 100% owned by one person here?
Not for this special subsection. Section 10-30(c)(2) includes ownership as a joint tenant or tenant by the entirety, as well as 100% ownership alone or 100% beneficial ownership of a land trust. Do not substitute the ordinary meaning for this defined advertising exception. It does not automatically extend to every tenant-in-common interest or resolve another owner's consent, title or conveyancing rights. Qualification for this advertising provision does not authorize one tenant by the entirety to convey without the other.
Must a sponsoring broker list every individual on its own advertisements?
No. Rule .715(e) says Section 10-30 does not require the sponsoring broker to include a sponsored licensee's name on the sponsoring broker's signs or other advertising. That is different from omitting the individual identity when .720(g) requires it in the individual's initial digital licensed-activity communication.
Must a designated managing broker use that title in advertising?
A person registered in that role must identify the status in advertising that includes their name, except on For Sale or similar signs placed on real property. A managing broker who is not designated in that role may identify as a managing broker but may not hold out as a designated managing broker. A credential and a particular supervision appointment are different.
Can an owner exemption or fair-housing logo make discriminatory wording lawful?
No such blanket permission follows. Section 3-102(F) addresses prohibited discriminatory notices, statements and advertisements. The private single-family sale and small owner-occupied apartment exemptions in Section 3-106(A) and (B) expressly preserve paragraph (F). A logo does not cure a prohibited preference. For the current protected grounds and other distinct exceptions, use the linked Illinois Human Rights Act guide.
What if online leads will be sold or shared?
Section 10-35(a) requires a timely, readily apparent disclosure when the licensee intends to sell or share consumer information gathered through the Internet or other electronic media. The same section prohibits deceptive domains, deceptive or unauthorized framing, phishing and deceptive traffic diversion. This is not a complete privacy, telemarketing, messaging-consent or platform-terms audit.
Can an absolute auction have a minimum bid?
Rule .715(a)(4) treats advertising an absolute auction or auction without reserve as deceptive when a minimum or opening bid is required. Brokerage identification does not cure a false auction claim. The rule also prohibits advertising that creates a reasonable likelihood of confusion about the property's permitted use.
Keep practising
Your next practice step
Put Illinois advertising into practice
Check sponsor identity, required disclosures and whether the message itself is lawful.
These web resources are free. The app has a separate free starter tier and optional paid full access.
Official sources and scope
Checked October 24, 2026 against the PSI outline and relevant current Illinois provisions. Official indexed statutory and adopted-rule text was used where direct ILGA retrieval returned errors or timed out; the complete relevant digital-advertising clauses were retrieved from the official index. The advertising rule is the adopted July 7, 2025 version, and the digital rule retains its February 23, 2021 amendment note. Proposed rules were not treated as law. This is exam preparation, not approval of an actual advertisement, platform, auction, data practice, brokerage identity or out-of-state activity.
- PSI Illinois booklet, June 24, 2026: Illinois II.B and whole License Act area
- 225 ILCS 454/1-10: blind-ad and team definitions
- 225 ILCS 454/10-30: truthfulness, identity, size and owner advertising
- 225 ILCS 454/10-35: Internet conduct and consumer information
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.715: advertising, size alternatives and exceptions
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.720: digital advertising and communication
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.765: written license-status disclosure to parties
- 775 ILCS 5/3-102(F): discriminatory publication
- 775 ILCS 5/3-106(A)-(B): stated exemptions preserve the publication rule
This is exam preparation, not advice for a specific transaction. State law and the applicable facts control. Our editorial and corrections process explains how to report an issue.