- Official section
- National III: Valuation
- Broker weight
- 8% of the national broker portion
- Expected scored items
- Valuation accounts for about 8 of 100 items
Illinois exam glossary
Plottage and assemblage
Two parcels do not become more valuable simply because one buyer owns both. Plottage appears only when the combined tract can do something the separate parcels could not do as well, and when the market value of that added utility exceeds the premiums, approvals, time, infrastructure, and risk needed to create it.
Last updated: August 1, 2026
What does this exam area cover?
Short answer: Assemblage is the process of acquiring and combining adjacent parcels. Plottage is the incremental value, if any, created because the assembled tract supports greater utility or a more productive highest and best use. Gross plottage increment equals combined value minus the sum of separate values. Net feasibility must also consider acquisition premiums, holdouts, demolition, title, survey, approval, infrastructure, carrying, financing, development, sale, time, and risk costs.
This guide follows the current Illinois appraiser statute and agency resources, USPAP access from The Appraisal Foundation, the PSI Illinois exam outline, the Illinois Plat Act, and current municipal subdivision and resubdivision approval provisions, all checked through August 1, 2026. State statutes do not replace local zoning, subdivision ordinances, official maps, utility rules, county requirements, private restrictions, title conditions, or project-specific professional review. The exam formula is a valuation shortcut, not a complete development pro forma.
What is on the official outline?
- Topic
- Define the parcels
- What to know
- Legal description, parcel identification number, owner, lot, block, subdivision, metes and bounds, survey, area, boundary, title, easement, lien, tax status, and effective date
- Best exam move
- Start with what each parcel legally is and what rights can actually be acquired.
- Topic
- Distinguish assemblage and plottage
- What to know
- Acquisition process, common control, adjacent parcel, unified site, action, value effect, increment, separate value, combined value, ownership, development plan, and market support
- Best exam move
- Assemblage is the combination process; plottage is the supported increase in value after combination.
- Topic
- Establish separate parcel values
- What to know
- Current use, highest and best use, land sale, rights, zoning, shape, access, utilities, size, topography, environmental condition, income, improvement contribution, and independent sale
- Best exam move
- Value each parcel under its separate effective-date market position before assuming combined use.
- Topic
- Define the proposed combined use
- What to know
- Residential, multifamily, retail, office, industrial, mixed use, parking, access, frontage, density, floor area, loading, stormwater, open space, utility, phasing, and design
- Best exam move
- A larger tract needs a specific supported utility, not a vague claim that bigger is always better.
- Topic
- Test legal permissibility
- What to know
- Zoning, comprehensive plan, official map, subdivision ordinance, resubdivision, plat approval, variance, special use, density, setback, height, parking, dedication, private restriction, easement, and permit
- Best exam move
- Potential use is not value unless approval is reasonably supported under effective-date conditions.
- Topic
- Test physical possibility
- What to know
- Combined shape, frontage, access, traffic, topography, soil, utilities, water, sewer, stormwater, floodplain, wetlands, environmental condition, infrastructure, building envelope, and construction access
- Best exam move
- Combination can solve a size problem while exposing a utility, environmental, or access constraint.
- Topic
- Test financial feasibility
- What to know
- Market demand, rent, sale price, absorption, direct cost, indirect cost, acquisition, demolition, remediation, infrastructure, financing, carrying, approval, tax, contingency, entrepreneurial incentive, and present value
- Best exam move
- The combined use must create enough value to cover every burden and a market-supported reward.
- Topic
- Select the maximally productive use
- What to know
- Alternative use, residual land value, rate of return, risk, timing, density, phasing, interim use, current use, sale, hold, development, and highest residual value
- Best exam move
- Among feasible uses, highest and best use is the one producing the highest supported value, not automatically the densest plan.
- Topic
- Calculate gross plottage increment
- What to know
- Parcel A value, parcel B value, parcel C value, separate total, combined tract value, increment, positive difference, zero difference, negative difference, rounding, and effective-date consistency
- Best exam move
- Combined value minus the sum of separate values equals gross plottage increment in a simplified question.
- Topic
- Calculate net assemblage feasibility
- What to know
- Gross increment, acquisition premium, brokerage, legal, survey, title, demolition, relocation, remediation, approval, design, carrying, financing, option, closing, tax, contingency, and opportunity cost
- Best exam move
- A positive gross increment can still produce a negative net project result after assemblage costs.
- Topic
- Analyze holdout risk
- What to know
- Last parcel, strategic position, asking premium, special purchaser, disclosure, confidentiality, option, phased closing, alternate design, condemnation limit, negotiation, delay, financing expiration, and abandonment
- Best exam move
- The last parcel can capture part of the expected increment and change project feasibility.
- Topic
- Use options and conditions
- What to know
- Option contract, due diligence, zoning contingency, simultaneous closing, assignment, extension, access agreement, survey right, environmental test, title cure, financing condition, confidentiality, and termination
- Best exam move
- Control can be assembled before full ownership, but contract rights, cost, expiration, and enforceability matter.
- Topic
- Handle existing improvements
- What to know
- Current contribution, demolition, relocation, adaptive reuse, interim income, tenant, lease termination, salvage, environmental material, utility disconnection, carrying cost, and lost rent
- Best exam move
- An existing building can add interim value, require costly removal, or prevent immediate unified use.
- Topic
- Separate common ownership and legal lots
- What to know
- Same owner, separate deed, separate tax parcel, consolidated assessment, zoning lot, legal lot, subdivision plat, resubdivision, lot line, title, mortgage, release, and local approval
- Best exam move
- Common ownership does not automatically erase lot lines, liens, tax parcels, plat requirements, or local land-use rules.
- Topic
- Understand Illinois plat requirements
- What to know
- Illinois Plat Act, survey, registered land surveyor, subdivision, parts under five acres, public streets, utilities, parks, lots, dimensions, acknowledgment, approval, recording, and statutory exception
- Best exam move
- Use current statute and local review for a real division; do not turn an exam definition into a recording opinion.
- Topic
- Understand municipal approval
- What to know
- Subdivision, resubdivision, official map, preliminary approval, final approval, supporting data, streets, sewer, storm drain, public ground, easement, waste disposal, bond, phased approval, and recording
- Best exam move
- A proposed combined or redivided plan can face approval, infrastructure, dedication, and security requirements.
- Topic
- Separate excess and surplus land
- What to know
- Separate highest and best use, independent sale, legal division, access, utility, surplus utility, existing use, future use, combination, adjacent owner, and contributory value
- Best exam move
- Excess land can stand alone; surplus land cannot currently be separated for an independent highest and best use.
- Topic
- Verify assemblage transactions
- What to know
- Buyer motivation, seller knowledge, holdout, option, related party, special price, exposure, contract terms, non-realty item, simultaneous closing, deed, title, and market comparability
- Best exam move
- A strategic acquisition price may include special value and require adjustment or exclusion as ordinary comparable evidence.
- Topic
- Reconcile uncertainty
- What to know
- Approval probability, acquisition probability, cost range, time, demand, absorption, interest rate, environmental risk, alternate plan, sensitivity, scenario, discount, market participant, and final value
- Best exam move
- Value the effective-date probability and risk of assemblage rather than assuming a completed future project with certainty.
Which distinctions produce the most mistakes?
- Terms
- Assemblage vs. plottage
- Difference
- Assemblage is the process of acquiring and combining parcels. Plottage is the value increase that may result from the combination.
- Question cue
- Action versus value effect.
- Terms
- Plottage increment vs. project profit
- Difference
- Plottage increment compares combined value with separate values. Project profit subtracts acquisition, approval, development, financing, carrying, sale, and other burdens and includes required reward.
- Question cue
- Gross land-value gain versus net investment result.
- Terms
- Market value vs. special value
- Difference
- Market value reflects typical market participants under its definition. Special value arises from a unique benefit to a particular buyer, such as completing an assemblage.
- Question cue
- Broad market utility versus buyer-specific synergy.
- Terms
- Holdout price vs. ordinary parcel value
- Difference
- A holdout price can capture strategic leverage over one assembler. Ordinary value reflects exposure to typical buyers without that unique dependency.
- Question cue
- Strategic premium versus normal market evidence.
- Terms
- Combination vs. subdivision
- Difference
- Combination joins parcels for unified use. Subdivision divides land into new lots or parcels under applicable survey, plat, approval, and recording rules.
- Question cue
- Join versus divide.
- Terms
- Common ownership vs. legal merger
- Difference
- Common ownership means one party owns multiple parcels. Legal treatment of lot lines, zoning lots, plats, titles, taxes, and mortgages depends on separate governing rules and approvals.
- Question cue
- Same owner versus changed legal parcel structure.
- Terms
- Tax parcel vs. legal lot
- Difference
- A tax parcel is an assessment and administration unit. A legal lot is created or recognized under deeds, plats, statutes, and local land-use rules.
- Question cue
- Assessment identifier versus land-title and plat status.
- Terms
- Excess land vs. surplus land
- Difference
- Excess land can be separated and has an independent highest and best use. Surplus land cannot currently be separated for an independent use and adds utility to the existing property.
- Question cue
- Separately usable versus extra but not separately usable.
- Terms
- Gross increment vs. net increment
- Difference
- Gross increment is combined value minus separate values. Net increment further recognizes costs and burdens required to assemble and realize the combined use.
- Question cue
- Before costs versus after costs.
- Terms
- Potential use vs. highest and best use
- Difference
- Potential use is one possible idea. Highest and best use must pass legal, physical, financial, and maximal-productivity tests under effective-date conditions.
- Question cue
- Concept versus supported conclusion.
- Terms
- Control vs. ownership
- Difference
- Control can arise through options or enforceable contracts. Ownership transfers the property interest, subject to the documents and closing conditions.
- Question cue
- Right to acquire versus acquired title.
- Terms
- Plottage value vs. plottage percentage
- Difference
- Plottage value is a dollar increment. A plottage percentage expresses that increment relative to a stated base, which must be identified clearly.
- Question cue
- Dollar gain versus ratio to a defined denominator.
The A-S-S-E-M-B-L-E feasibility map
- Assets: identify every parcel, legal description, title interest, owner, lien, tax status, survey, boundary, easement, improvement, lease, environmental condition, separate value, and effective date.
- Site concept: define the unified use, layout, access, density, utilities, infrastructure, phasing, public improvements, market segment, and specific utility gained from combination.
- Statutory and local path: test zoning, subdivision and resubdivision rules, official map, plat, survey, municipal or county approval, dedication, bond, recording, private restriction, permit, and appeal risk.
- Economics: forecast combined value, rent, sale price, absorption, acquisition premiums, holdout exposure, demolition, relocation, remediation, direct and indirect development cost, financing, carrying, sale cost, contingency, and required reward.
- Market and highest use: prove legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, maximal productivity, buyer demand, timing, alternatives, interim use, and the probability that the combined plan will occur.
- Before-and-after math: total separate values, estimate combined tract value on a consistent date and premise, calculate gross increment, then subtract assemblage burdens to understand net feasibility without confusing it with project profit.
- Leverage and control: analyze options, staged or simultaneous closings, confidentiality, alternate designs, holdouts, special purchaser value, contract expiration, title cure, lender releases, and failure scenarios.
- Explain the result: reconcile uncertainty, separate tax parcels from legal lots, distinguish common ownership from merger, verify strategic transactions, and report assumptions rather than valuing a future approval as certain.
- Step
- 1. Separate value
- Calculation
- Parcel A + Parcel B + Parcel C
- Question
- What are the parcels worth independently?
- Step
- 2. Combined value
- Calculation
- Value of unified tract under supported use
- Question
- What utility does combination create?
- Step
- 3. Gross increment
- Calculation
- Combined value - separate total
- Question
- Is there positive plottage value?
- Step
- 4. Assemblage burden
- Calculation
- Premiums + legal + survey + approval + carry + other costs
- Question
- What must be spent to realize control?
- Step
- 5. Net effect
- Calculation
- Gross increment - assemblage burden
- Question
- Does combination still add net value before development?
- Step
- 6. Full feasibility
- Calculation
- Completed value - all acquisition, development, sale, time, and risk burdens
- Question
- Is the project financially feasible?
How do the rules work in scenarios?
Calculate gross plottage increment
Scenario: Three adjacent parcels are worth $300,000, $250,000, and $350,000 separately. The combined tract is worth $1,180,000 under a supported unified use.
- $300,000 + $250,000 + $350,000 = $900,000 separate total.
- $1,180,000 - $900,000 = $280,000.
- The result is gross plottage increment before assemblage costs.
Answer: The gross plottage increment is $280,000.
Positive plottage produces weak net feasibility
Scenario: Gross plottage increment is $280,000. Acquisition premiums, legal and survey work, carrying cost, title cure, and approval expense total $235,000.
- $280,000 - $235,000 = $45,000 remaining increment before full development cost and required reward.
- The gross gain is positive.
- The thin remainder can be inadequate once development risk and entrepreneurial incentive are considered.
Answer: Net assemblage effect is only $45,000 before full project feasibility, so gross plottage alone does not prove a good project.
The last parcel creates holdout risk
Scenario: A developer controls four of five parcels. The final owner learns the project cannot achieve required access without that parcel and doubles the asking price.
- The last parcel has strategic importance to this particular assembler.
- The premium can absorb expected plottage value.
- The transaction may reflect special value and may not be ordinary comparable evidence for unrelated sites.
Answer: Recalculate feasibility and verify special motivation before treating the holdout price as market value.
Combination creates no greater use
Scenario: Two adjacent rural lots already support the same low-density use separately and together. Access, zoning, utility, and buyer demand do not improve after combination.
- Adjacency and common ownership do not create extra utility by themselves.
- The combined tract can equal the sum of separate values.
- Transaction and holding costs could make assemblage uneconomic.
Answer: Do not assume plottage value when combination does not improve highest and best use or market utility.
A zoning idea is not current value
Scenario: An assembled tract could support apartments only if a rezoning, road improvement, and sewer extension occur. Approval is uncertain and the infrastructure is unfunded.
- The conceptual use has not yet passed legal and physical support tests.
- Cost, time, approval probability, and market demand affect present value.
- Valuing the tract as an approved completed apartment site would ignore risk.
Answer: Reflect effective-date approval probability and costs rather than assuming the future plan is certain.
Common ownership does not erase lot lines
Scenario: One owner acquires two platted lots and receives one combined tax mailing. Separate deeds, mortgages, and recorded lot lines remain.
- Administrative tax treatment does not resolve title and plat status.
- Mortgage releases, zoning-lot rules, survey, local approval, and recording can matter.
- The owner must verify the legal path for any unified or redivided project.
Answer: Do not treat one owner or tax bill as proof of legal parcel merger.
Existing rent offsets assembly carrying cost
Scenario: Several acquired buildings produce interim net rent while the final parcel and approvals are pursued, but lease termination and demolition will later cost money.
- Interim income can reduce net carrying burden.
- Tenant rights, termination timing, lost rent, relocation, and demolition affect the schedule.
- The income should be modeled with the same acquisition and development timeline.
Answer: Include supported interim benefits and later termination costs in the full assemblage feasibility analysis.
What are the common exam traps?
- Trap
- Calling assemblage plottage
- Correction
- Assemblage is the process; plottage is the value increment that may result.
- Trap
- Assuming adjacency creates value
- Correction
- Combination must improve utility or highest and best use under market-supported conditions.
- Trap
- Using combined value without separate values
- Correction
- Gross increment requires a consistent separate-parcel baseline.
- Trap
- Calling gross increment profit
- Correction
- Subtract premiums, transaction, approval, carrying, development, financing, sale, time, risk, and required reward.
- Trap
- Ignoring holdouts
- Correction
- A strategically necessary parcel can capture expected increment and delay or defeat the plan.
- Trap
- Using holdout price as ordinary value
- Correction
- Verify buyer-specific motivation and special assemblage benefit before treating it as market evidence.
- Trap
- Assuming ownership equals legal merger
- Correction
- Check deeds, plats, lot lines, mortgages, taxes, zoning-lot rules, survey, approvals, and recording.
- Trap
- Assuming tax parcel equals legal lot
- Correction
- Assessment administration and legal subdivision status are different systems.
- Trap
- Ignoring Illinois and local plat rules
- Correction
- Subdivision or resubdivision can require survey, approval, infrastructure, dedication, bond, and recording steps.
- Trap
- Valuing unapproved potential as certain
- Correction
- Reflect approval probability, time, cost, alternatives, market demand, and effective-date expectations.
- Trap
- Ignoring existing leases
- Correction
- Tenant rights can provide interim income and create termination, relocation, timing, and demolition burdens.
- Trap
- Ignoring environmental and utility constraints
- Correction
- A larger site can still fail physical or financial feasibility because of remediation, sewer, stormwater, flood, soil, or access.
- Trap
- Confusing excess and surplus land
- Correction
- Excess land has an independent highest and best use; surplus land does not currently support separate use.
- Trap
- Assuming densest means maximally productive
- Correction
- The best use is the feasible use producing the highest supported value after cost, time, absorption, and risk.
- Trap
- Ignoring failure scenarios
- Correction
- Analyze partial assembly, expired options, alternate design, resale of parcels, carrying cost, and project abandonment.
Can you answer these original practice questions?
These questions are original study items aligned to the published outline. They are not copied, recalled, or predicted PSI questions.
1. What is assemblage?
- The process of acquiring and combining adjacent parcels
- The value increase after combination
- Dividing one parcel into lots
- Mortgage amortization
Show answer and explanation
Answer: The process of acquiring and combining adjacent parcels
Plottage is the value effect that may result from assemblage.
2. What is plottage?
- The value increase that may result from combining parcels
- The survey alone
- The tax bill
- The owner's loan balance
Show answer and explanation
Answer: The value increase that may result from combining parcels
The combined tract must support greater market utility or a more productive use.
3. Separate parcel values total $800,000 and combined value is $1,050,000. What is gross plottage increment?
- $250,000
- $1,850,000
- $800,000
- $1,050,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: $250,000
$1,050,000 - $800,000 = $250,000 before assemblage costs.
4. Does positive gross plottage prove project profit?
- No, all acquisition, approval, development, time, risk, and sale burdens remain
- Yes, always
- Yes, if parcels touch
- Only when there is one tax bill
Show answer and explanation
Answer: No, all acquisition, approval, development, time, risk, and sale burdens remain
Gross land-value gain and net investment return are different measures.
5. What is a holdout?
- An owner who resists sale or seeks a strategic premium in an assemblage
- A lender escrow
- A subdivision bond
- A tax depreciation method
Show answer and explanation
Answer: An owner who resists sale or seeks a strategic premium in an assemblage
The last necessary parcel can capture buyer-specific special value.
6. What must a proposed combined use pass?
- Legal, physical, financial, and maximal-productivity tests
- Only a size test
- Only common ownership
- Only tax consolidation
Show answer and explanation
Answer: Legal, physical, financial, and maximal-productivity tests
These are the four tests of highest and best use.
7. Does one owner of two parcels prove legal merger?
- No, title, plats, lot lines, mortgages, local rules, approvals, and recording still matter
- Yes, automatically
- Yes, if taxes are mailed together
- Yes, without a survey
Show answer and explanation
Answer: No, title, plats, lot lines, mortgages, local rules, approvals, and recording still matter
Common ownership and legal parcel structure are distinct.
8. How does subdivision differ from assemblage?
- Subdivision divides land; assemblage combines control of parcels
- They are identical
- Subdivision increases value automatically
- Assemblage applies only to buildings
Show answer and explanation
Answer: Subdivision divides land; assemblage combines control of parcels
A project may use both processes at different stages.
9. What is excess land?
- Land that can be separated and has an independent highest and best use
- Any yard area
- Land with no value
- A tax parcel only
Show answer and explanation
Answer: Land that can be separated and has an independent highest and best use
Surplus land cannot currently be separated for an independent use.
10. Why can a holdout sale be a weak ordinary comparable?
- Its price may include special value to one assembler
- It is always unrecorded
- It never transfers title
- It has no buyer
Show answer and explanation
Answer: Its price may include special value to one assembler
The unique dependency can produce a premium unavailable in transactions with typical buyers.
How should you study this area?
- Session
- Session 1
- Focus
- Lock the vocabulary
- Proof you are ready
- Classify 40 scenarios as assemblage, plottage, subdivision, resubdivision, holdout, excess land, surplus land, or special value.
- Session
- Session 2
- Focus
- Calculate the increment
- Proof you are ready
- Solve 25 separate-value, combined-value, gross-increment, assemblage-cost, and net-effect problems with clearly labeled denominators.
- Session
- Session 3
- Focus
- Test highest and best use
- Proof you are ready
- Evaluate 20 combined-use concepts for legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximal productivity.
- Session
- Session 4
- Focus
- Map the Illinois process
- Proof you are ready
- Trace survey, title, zoning, official map, preliminary approval, final plat, infrastructure, dedication, bond, recording, and local ordinance issues in ten projects.
- Session
- Session 5
- Focus
- Stress the acquisition
- Proof you are ready
- Model 15 holdout, option-expiration, partial-assembly, alternate-design, tenant, remediation, financing, and project-abandonment scenarios.
- Session
- Session 6
- Focus
- Run A-S-S-E-M-B-L-E
- Proof you are ready
- Complete two assemblage feasibility analyses, reconcile uncertainty and special value, then score at least 90 percent and explain every miss.
Do not count recognition as mastery. Close the notes and explain the rule, apply it to a new fact pattern, and identify why each distractor fails.
Practice the topic in Pass Illinois
From concept to decision
Drill this topic, then review the explanation
Pass Illinois gives you original national and Illinois questions, topic-by-topic study, clear explanations, timed practice, flashcards, progress tracking, and Math Coach. Start free, find the weak distinction, and focus the next session there.
Questions students ask about Plottage and Assemblage: Illinois Exam Guide
What is plottage in real estate?
Plottage is the value increase that can result when adjacent parcels are combined into one ownership or development unit and the combined tract supports a more productive use than the parcels supported separately. The increase is often called plottage value or plottage increment. It is not guaranteed merely because parcels touch.
What is assemblage?
Assemblage is the process of acquiring and combining two or more adjacent parcels under common control for a unified purpose. Plottage is the value effect that may result from that process. On an exam, remember: assemblage is the action; plottage is the increase in value.
How is plottage value calculated?
Under a simplified exam question, subtract the sum of the separate parcel values from the value of the assembled tract. If separate values total $900,000 and the combined tract is worth $1,200,000, the gross plottage increment is $300,000. Acquisition premiums, demolition, carrying, legal, approval, infrastructure, and development costs must be considered separately in a real feasibility analysis.
Does assemblage always create plottage value?
No. The combined site must support greater market utility or a more productive highest and best use. A merger can create no gain or even reduce flexibility if zoning, access, environmental conditions, easements, infrastructure, title, shape, market demand, or approval costs offset the benefit.
What is a holdout in an assemblage?
A holdout is an owner who refuses to sell or demands a premium after recognizing that a parcel is important to the planned assemblage. The premium can reflect special value to the assembler rather than ordinary market value to typical buyers. Confidential acquisition strategy, options, and staged closings can reduce exposure but create legal and practical issues of their own.
Is the holdout price the market value of that parcel?
Not automatically. A price paid because one specific buyer needs the last parcel can include special purchaser or assemblage value unavailable to the broader market. The appraiser verifies motivation, exposure, negotiation, alternatives, and transaction conditions before using it as comparable market evidence.
How does highest and best use relate to plottage?
The combined use must be legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally productive. A conceptual apartment, retail, industrial, or mixed-use project does not create plottage unless zoning, site capacity, access, utilities, approvals, market demand, cost, timing, and risk support it as of the effective date.
Does one owner and one tax bill make parcels legally merged?
No. Common ownership, one tax mailing, consolidated assessment, physical use, zoning-lot treatment, and a legally approved or recorded resubdivision are different concepts. Illinois plat and municipal approval rules can apply to subdivision or resubdivision. A live project requires local ordinance, survey, title, land-use, utility, lender, and recording review.
What is the difference between plottage and subdivision?
Plottage concerns value created by combining parcels. Subdivision divides land into multiple legal lots or parcels, often with plat, infrastructure, dedication, and approval requirements. A developer may first assemble land and later resubdivide the combined tract, but the two steps and value effects are distinct.
Can excess land create plottage?
It can contribute to a combination, but excess land and plottage are different. Excess land can be separately sold or developed because it has its own highest and best use. Plottage is the incremental value produced by combination. Surplus land cannot currently be separated for another highest and best use and may add only to the existing property.
Are these official PSI questions or development advice?
No. The practice questions are original, and primary sources were checked through August 1, 2026. This page is exam education, not an appraisal, title opinion, zoning opinion, plat approval, acquisition strategy, or development recommendation. Live assemblage requires attorneys, surveyors, planners, engineers, appraisers, tax advisers, lenders, and local authorities as appropriate.
Primary sources
- PSI Illinois Candidate Information Booklet effective June 24, 2026
- 225 ILCS 458, current Illinois Real Estate Appraiser Licensing Act of 2002
- Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, current Real Estate Appraisal licensing resources
- The Appraisal Foundation, current 2024 Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice access
- 12 CFR 34.42, current federal market value and appraisal definitions
- 765 ILCS 205, current Illinois Plat Act, including survey and subdivision-plat provisions
- 65 ILCS 5/11-12-8, current municipal preliminary and final subdivision or resubdivision plat approval provisions
The current official outline controls the tested scope. Statutes, regulations, and official agency materials control when a general study rule and a jurisdiction-specific rule differ.
Editorial status
Checked against primary sources
The Pass Illinois editorial team last checked this guide on August 1, 2026. Every practice question is an original study item, and the source links above let you verify the rules that support the lesson.