Illinois exam glossary
Earnest money
An earnest-money dispute can involve two different questions: who has the better contract claim, and what the escrow holder may do with the money now. A buyer's missed closing does not, by itself, authorize the broker to pay the seller. Start with the signed contract, then apply the rule governing the actual holder.
Last reviewed:
The short answer
Earnest money is an agreed purchase-contract deposit. It may be credited at closing, returned after an authorized termination or applied under an enforceable default provision. It is not universally required for a valid contract, and neither party automatically owns it merely because an offer was accepted or canceled. When an Illinois sponsoring broker accepts it, escrow rules govern the account, deposit, records and release. A written dispute or the broker's actual knowledge of a contested payout requires a continued hold until an authorized disposition route applies.
Reviewed October 25, 2026. PSI national V.B.2 covers purchase-and-lease contract topics including earnest money; Illinois II.I covers handling client and customer money, with related discipline in II.K. The whole national Contracts domain has 19 of 100 scored questions; the whole Illinois License Act domain has 16 of 40. Neither is a page-specific quota. This lesson distinguishes the buyer's contract duties, the sponsoring broker's escrow duties and a court's determination of disputed rights.
Follow the money and the authority
- Read the deposit clause before using a rule of thumb. Identify the amount, payment form, initial and additional deadlines, actual holder, contingencies and default terms. Illinois does not impose one universal earnest-money percentage on every purchase.
- Separate payment from deposit. The buyer's duty to deliver money under the contract differs from the sponsoring broker's deadline to place accepted escrow money in the proper account. A future contractual payment date is not permission to mishandle money already accepted.
- Identify whose escrow rule applies. A sponsoring broker uses the separate federally insured escrow account and required records. A title company or attorney may be the holder instead; do not apply every broker-specific rule to every escrowee automatically.
- Confirm receipt and payment status. Give and retain the required cash receipt. Notify all principals in writing of failed tender, dishonor or an apparently deficient amount. A receipt or an app's pending-transfer screen does not necessarily mean the payor's depository honored the funds.
- Find release authority separately from the claimed entitlement. Follow the contract and applicable rule, an authorized all-party written direction, a competent court order or the appropriate legal process. A contingency claim, seller demand or passage of 14 days alone is not a universal release instruction.
- Stop an anticipated payout when there is a known contest. A written dispute or actual knowledge is enough under Rule 1450.750(h); do not insist on a formal objection form before recognizing the dispute. Preserve the money and records while the authorized process resolves disposition.
- Finish the accounting. Apply the deposit once on the closing statement, preserve the supporting transfer and release records, and complete required reconciliation and retention. A vendor or an assistant can help with permitted tasks, but the sponsoring broker retains responsibility.
| Question | Controlling point | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Must there be a deposit? | Mutual promises can supply consideration; read the actual contract | Every no-deposit contract is void |
| How much is due? | The agreed amount and deadlines | A universal required percentage |
| Who holds it? | Identify the actual escrowee | The listing broker always holds it |
| When must the broker deposit it? | Applicable next business day under Rule 1450.750(d) | The buyer delivery deadline and bank deposit deadline are identical |
| What if payment fails? | Written notice to all principals | Quietly wait for a replacement |
| Can it be released? | Honored funds and the applicable release authority | Receipt alone proves clearance |
| What if a party objects orally? | Actual knowledge of a contest triggers the hold rule | Only a formal written objection counts |
| Does 14 days settle it? | Use the actual authorized contract procedure and rule safeguards | Every 14-day notice creates payout authority |
| Who gets it after default? | Contract, enforceable remedy and the facts | The seller automatically wins |
| What happens at closing? | Apply the agreed deposit credit once | Count the same funds twice |
The distinctions that matter
| Distinction | How it works | What to notice |
|---|---|---|
| Earnest money vs. consideration | Earnest money is a deposit promised under the deal. Consideration is the bargained legal value supporting the contract and can consist of mutual promises without a deposit. | Deposit versus contract value. |
| Earnest money vs. down payment | Earnest money is an advance deposit. In a typical financed purchase it is credited toward the buyer's total funds due, which may include down payment and costs. The deposit is not automatically the entire down payment, an extra purchase charge or a second credit. | Early deposit versus closing equity. |
| Earnest money vs. option consideration | Earnest money secures duties under a purchase contract. Option consideration supports an irrevocable offer and may have different refund and credit terms. | Purchase performance versus option right. |
| Earnest money vs. security deposit | Earnest money relates to a purchase. A security deposit secures lease obligations, although Illinois includes both within escrow money in many brokerage settings. | Sale deposit versus lease protection. |
| Earnest money vs. liquidated damages | Earnest money is the fund. Liquidated damages are a contractual remedy that may direct forfeiture of that fund after a qualifying default. | Money held versus remedy applied. |
| Entitlement vs. disbursement authority | A party may claim the contract entitles it to the deposit, while the escrow holder still lacks authority to release disputed money without the required direction or process. | Who should win versus who may pay now. |
| Refund right vs. release form | A properly exercised contingency may support a refund claim. Disbursement still requires the applicable authority. An all-party release is one route, not the only possible route in every case; a contract procedure or court order can matter. | Contract right versus payout instruction. |
| Escrow account vs. operating account | An escrow account holds money belonging to transaction parties. An operating account holds brokerage money used for business expenses. | Others' money versus broker's money. |
| Commingling vs. conversion | Commingling improperly mixes others' money with personal or business money. Conversion is unauthorized use or control of another's property. | Mixed custody versus wrongful use. |
| Dishonored deposit vs. void contract | A bounced check means payment failed and may create default or another contract remedy. It does not automatically erase an otherwise formed contract. | Failed performance versus no agreement. |
| Consensual release vs. court order | A consensual release reflects written direction from the required parties. A court order commands disposition after judicial process. | Party agreement versus judicial command. |
| Escrow holder vs. advocate | The escrow holder safeguards and disburses under authority. A buyer's or seller's agent advocates within agency duties but cannot use escrow control to decide the dispute. | Neutral custody versus representation. |
| Contract notice period vs. automatic release | Rule 1450.750(g)(7) gives a contract-authorized notice example with at least 14 days, the proposed distribution and an objection deadline. It does not create a universal right to mail a notice and ignore a known dispute. | Does the signed contract authorize this route, and is there a contest? |
Work through the facts
Valid contract without a deposit
Buyer and seller sign a definite purchase agreement exchanging promises to buy and convey. The contract states that no earnest money is required.
- Mutual promises can supply consideration.
- The parties deliberately required no deposit.
- A universal earnest-money requirement does not exist.
Answer: The absence of earnest money alone does not invalidate the contract.
Deposit due after acceptance
The contract requires a $5,000 deposit one business day after acceptance and permits the sponsoring broker to deposit it by the next business day after receipt. The buyer delivers it on time, and the broker deposits it on that next business day. The depository is open on both days.
- The contract fixes the buyer's delivery duty and supplies the stated receipt-based deposit timing.
- The sponsoring broker accepted escrow money.
- The facts state that the broker used the applicable next-business-day deadline.
Answer: The buyer and sponsoring broker met the stated timing facts.
Dishonored earnest-money check
A buyer's check is returned unpaid. The sponsoring broker says nothing because the broker expects the buyer to replace it next week.
- The payment was dishonored.
- Rule 1450.750 requires written notice to all principals.
- Hope of replacement does not excuse the notice duty.
Answer: The sponsoring broker must notify all principals in writing.
Financing contingency refund
Buyer timely applies as required, cannot obtain the specified financing, and delivers a compliant termination notice before the deadline. Both parties sign a release returning the deposit.
- The facts satisfy the stated contingency.
- Timely notice validly terminates under the assumed contract.
- The signed release authorizes escrow disbursement.
Answer: The broker returns the deposit according to the written release.
Seller demands disputed deposit
Buyer misses closing. Seller demands the earnest money, but buyer contests default in writing and claims seller could not deliver title.
- The merits depend on contract and title facts.
- The sponsoring broker has actual written notice of a dispute.
- The broker cannot adjudicate it by paying the seller.
Answer: Continue holding the fund until an authorized disposition route exists.
Operating-account mistake
A broker deposits a buyer's earnest money into the brokerage operating account for convenience and plans to move it after the weekend.
- The deposit is money belonging to transaction parties.
- The operating account is not the required separate escrow account.
- Temporary mixing is still improper commingling.
Answer: The deposit was mishandled even if the broker intended to replace it.
Third-party payment platform
A brokerage uses an electronic service to collect and transmit earnest money. The vendor's report does not match the brokerage ledger, and the managing broker ignores it.
- A third-party service can support collection and transmission.
- Rule 1450.750 keeps statutory and regulatory responsibility with the licensee.
- The discrepancy requires prompt reconciliation and investigation.
Answer: Vendor use does not excuse the broker's accounting responsibility.
An oral objection is still knowledge
Before the proposed payout, the buyer tells the sponsoring broker directly that the buyer contests forfeiture. No written objection form has arrived.
- Rule 1450.750(h) covers a written dispute or actual knowledge of a contest.
- The broker now actually knows that the anticipated payment is disputed.
- The missing form does not justify paying the seller anyway.
Answer: Continue holding the deposit and follow an authorized disposition route.
Fourteen days without a contract route
A broker has no signed contract provision authorizing the proposed notice-based release and no all-party direction or court order. The broker proposes to pay the seller simply after mailing a 14-day letter.
- The rule's notice example implements directions in a signed contract.
- A self-created letter is not a substitute for the missing authority.
- A known dispute independently requires the continued hold.
Answer: The proposed 14-day letter does not supply the missing release authority. Follow the applicable authorized route and continue the hold if the payout is contested.
A commission claim does not buy a release
All required parties have supplied an authorized written direction returning the deposit. The broker demands that the buyer pay a disputed brokerage fee before the broker will release it.
- The direction must be followed under the applicable rule.
- The escrow fund is not leverage to settle the broker's compensation claim.
- A separate fee dispute does not create a right to delay the authorized payment.
Answer: Disburse as required. Address the compensation dispute through the proper separate process.
Pending funds are not honored funds
The electronic service shows a newly initiated earnest-money payment as pending. Before the payor's depository honors it, the broker wants to disburse an equivalent amount from other clients' escrow balances.
- The rule's disbursement provision begins with the payor's depository honoring the deposit.
- A pending screen does not establish that event.
- Other clients' money is not a bridge loan for this buyer.
Answer: Do not use other transaction funds to cover the pending deposit or treat it as cleared for disbursement.
The same deposit counted twice
A simplified closing worksheet shows $70,000 due from the buyer before crediting a $10,000 earnest-money deposit still held for the transaction. No other adjustments apply.
- Apply the $10,000 credit once.
- The remaining amount is $60,000.
- Subtracting it again to reach $50,000 would count the same money twice.
Answer: The remaining amount is $60,000 under the stated assumptions, subject to the actual settlement statement.
Mistakes to avoid
- Treating earnest money as required consideration Mutual promises can support a valid contract even when the agreed deposit is zero.
- Using a customary percentage The contract sets the amount, not a universal Illinois percentage.
- Calling the deposit the down payment The early deposit may be credited toward the buyer's larger closing contribution.
- Giving the seller ownership on acceptance The fund remains protected escrow money until an authorized disposition.
- Ignoring the contract due date Separate the buyer's deadline from the broker's deadline after acceptance of funds.
- Holding a check in a desk Tender and deposit escrow money through the sponsoring broker's compliant procedure on time.
- Putting money in the operating account Use a separate escrow account at a federally insured depository.
- Treating temporary mixing as harmless Commingling is improper even when the licensee plans to correct it later.
- Missing a cash receipt Provide a receipt to the cash payor and retain a physical or electronic copy.
- Hiding a bounced check Notify all principals in writing when escrow payment is dishonored.
- Promising an automatic contingency refund Verify performance, deadline, notice, termination, and release requirements.
- Paying the loudest party A demand is not authority to release contested money.
- Assuming default guarantees forfeiture Read the remedy clause and evaluate notice, cure, seller performance, and enforceability.
- Withholding release for commission leverage A sponsoring broker cannot delay an authorized disbursement because of a commission claim.
- Outsourcing responsibility to an app The licensee remains responsible when a third-party service handles earnest money.
Check your understanding
These are original teaching questions, not recalled or predicted PSI questions. Answer first, then explain why the other choices fail.
1. The signed purchase agreement exchanges definite buy-and-sell promises and expressly requires no earnest money. Which follows?
- Every Illinois purchase requires a fixed 5% deposit
- No deposit automatically makes the agreement voidable
- Only a cash deposit can supply consideration
- The absence of a deposit alone does not invalidate the contract
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. The absence of a deposit alone does not invalidate the contract
Mutual promises can supply consideration. If a different contract requires a deposit, that actual duty still matters.
2. A sponsoring broker accepts the contract's earnest money. How is it classified while properly held for the transaction?
- The brokerage's general working capital
- Escrow money
- Earned commission
- The seller's unrestricted operating revenue
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Escrow money
Rule 1450.750 treats accepted earnest money as escrow money, not the broker's revenue or an automatically earned seller payment.
3. Which account meets the basic sponsoring-broker escrow requirement?
- The operating account if funds are moved before closing
- Any sponsored agent's private payment account
- A personal account with a spreadsheet earmark
- A separate escrow account at a federally insured depository
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. A separate escrow account at a federally insured depository
Separation and the federally insured depository requirement both matter. A ledger label alone does not make an operating account compliant.
4. The contract supplies receipt-based timing. The broker accepts the deposit Tuesday; Wednesday is the next business day and the depository is open. What is the applicable latest deposit day on those facts?
- Friday regardless of the bank schedule
- Wednesday
- The next closing date
- Thirty calendar days later
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Wednesday
The stated next-business-day rule runs after receipt under the contract. This is separate from the buyer's earlier delivery obligation.
5. A buyer's earnest-money payment is dishonored, but the buyer promises a replacement. What must the sponsoring broker acting as escrow agent do?
- Use another buyer's deposit to cover the shortage
- Declare every contract automatically void
- Keep silent until the replacement arrives
- Notify all principals in writing
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Notify all principals in writing
Rule 1450.750(e) requires written notice; hoped-for replacement does not eliminate it or authorize use of other funds.
6. A sponsored agent wants to maintain a separate personal escrow account for the agent's transactions. Which is correct?
- The agent may do so if the deposits are small
- Buyer approval alone authorizes it
- Sponsored licensees may not maintain their own escrow accounts
- A five-year ledger automatically authorizes it
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Sponsored licensees may not maintain their own escrow accounts
Rule 1450.750(j) places compliant escrow procedures with the sponsoring broker and bars sponsored licensees' own escrow accounts.
7. Before payout, the buyer orally tells the broker the deposit is disputed. No written objection form has arrived. Which follows?
- The deposit becomes commission after fourteen days
- Actual knowledge of the contest requires continued holding under the dispute rule
- Only a written form can trigger the rule
- The broker must choose the more persuasive party
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Actual knowledge of the contest requires continued holding under the dispute rule
Subsection(h) covers a written dispute OR actual knowledge. The broker cannot ignore a known oral contest.
8. The broker has no contract-authorized notice release, all-party direction or court order. May mailing a self-created 14-day notice alone supply universal authority to pay the seller?
- Yes, because a mailed letter automatically overrides a known objection
- No; the actual authority and known-dispute requirements still control
- Yes, if the broker believes the seller should win
- Yes, every deposit has the same fourteen-day release rule
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. No; the actual authority and known-dispute requirements still control
Subsection(g)(7) implements signed contractual directions and gives a notice example. It is not a universal shortcut or an override of a known dispute.
9. All required parties have supplied an authorized refund direction. The broker demands payment of a disputed brokerage fee before complying. Which is correct?
- The buyer must always forfeit the refund to get the release
- Any commission claim converts the whole deposit to revenue
- The broker cannot delay the authorized disbursement as compensation leverage
- The broker can keep the deposit until every unrelated fee dispute ends
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The broker cannot delay the authorized disbursement as compensation leverage
The escrow rule prohibits using the authorized disbursement as leverage for licensee compensation. Analyze the separate claim through its proper process.
10. A payment platform shows pending earnest money that the payor's depository has not honored. The broker proposes paying out other clients' funds in anticipation of clearance. Which is correct?
- The payment vendor assumes every broker duty
- A pending screen is the same as honored funds
- The proposed use of other clients' funds is not authorized
- An expected replacement always excuses the shortage
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. The proposed use of other clients' funds is not authorized
The disbursement provision begins with honored funds. A third-party service does not remove responsibility or permit using another transaction's money.
11. Under the applicable published liquidated-damages analysis, which is accurate?
- Buyer default always entitles the seller to the deposit plus unlimited actual damages
- The contract and enforceability matter; a deposit demand is not automatic payout authority
- Every deposit clause is necessarily an unenforceable penalty
- The broker may conclusively decide which remedy the court must award
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. The contract and enforceability matter; a deposit demand is not automatic payout authority
Berggren applied the particular earnest-money clause as liquidated damages and rejected additional actual damages. It does not make every clause or every payout valid.
12. A simplified worksheet shows $70,000 due before one $10,000 earnest-money credit. No other adjustments apply. How much remains?
- $80,000
- $60,000
- $70,000
- $50,000
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. $60,000
Subtract the $10,000 once: $70,000 minus $10,000 equals $60,000. Applying it a second time would double-count the deposit.
Common questions
What is earnest money in Illinois?
An agreed deposit tied to a purchase contract. It can demonstrate commitment and later be credited, returned or applied under the contract and law. When a sponsoring broker accepts it, it is regulated escrow money held for the transaction parties' mutual benefit. Acceptance of an offer does not by itself turn the deposit into the seller's unrestricted money.
Is earnest money required for a valid purchase contract?
Not universally. Exchanged promises can supply consideration. A contract may nevertheless make an earnest-money payment a duty or condition, so failing to pay can have contractual consequences. Do not confuse the lack of a universal deposit requirement with permission to ignore a deposit clause.
Is there a required Illinois earnest-money percentage?
There is no universal percentage supplied by these broker escrow rules. Read the agreed dollar amount, any additional deposit and its deadline. A number used in one form, negotiation or court case is not a mandatory amount for every purchase.
Is earnest money the same as a down payment?
No. It is an advance deposit that is commonly credited toward the total amount the buyer must provide at closing. That amount may include the down payment and closing costs. Use the actual settlement statement and apply each deposit or separately paid charge once.
When must the Illinois sponsoring broker deposit accepted earnest money?
Rule 1450.750(d) uses no later than the next business day following the transaction, or after receipt of the money per the contract terms. It separately addresses a bank holiday or closure by using the next business day the depository is open. Read the contract and receipt facts; do not substitute a universal number of calendar days or confuse the buyer's delivery deadline with the broker's deposit deadline.
Where does a sponsoring broker keep earnest money?
In the required special escrow account, separate from personal and other business accounts, at a federally insured depository. Sponsored licensees may not maintain their own escrow accounts. A title company or attorney may instead be the agreed holder, and the law governing that holder needs separate analysis.
Can the broker put personal money in the escrow account?
The general rule prohibits commingling. The narrow service-charge exception permits specifically documented personal funds no greater than the depository minimum needed to avoid service charges, with proof available. It is not permission to use an operating balance or other clients' money. The rule also separately addresses documented transfers for disbursement.
Does earnest money earn interest?
The account ordinarily is non-interest-bearing unless another law requires interest or the principals specifically require it in writing. When an interest-bearing account is required, the principals must identify the interest recipient in writing. The broker should not choose the recipient unilaterally.
What happens if the buyer does not pay, the check bounces or the deposit is short?
The sponsoring broker acting as escrow agent must notify all principals in writing of failed tender, dishonor or an apparently deficient amount under the signed contract. A hoped-for replacement does not erase that duty. The separate contract default and remedy question still depends on the actual terms and facts.
When can the money go to the closing agent?
Rule 1450.750(g)(5) permits transfer to the closing agent up to two business days before the scheduled closing. The disbursement provisions require the payor's depository to have honored the deposit. Follow the actual contract and verified settlement directions; permission to transfer is not an instruction to use uncleared funds or credit the same deposit twice.
Is a contingency cancellation an automatic refund?
No. Determine whether the actual contingency was properly exercised, including its conditions, deadline and notice requirements. Then identify the holder's release authority. A buyer's assertion of a right to terminate is not itself an instruction to ignore a seller's known objection.
Must every earnest-money release have a new form signed by both sides?
An all-party written release or direction is a common route, with the appropriate next-business-day disbursement requirement after the last required direction. It is not the only possible route. The actual signed contract, a competent court order and the applicable rule and statute can provide other authority. A broker cannot invent authority merely because one party refuses a release.
Can the broker release money after sending a 14-day notice?
Not as a universal shortcut. Rule 1450.750(g)(7) gives an example implementing release directions in a signed contract, with at least 14 days' written notice, the intended distribution and an objection deadline. Follow the actual contract and the rule. If the broker knows a party contests the payout, subsection(h) requires continued holding until an authorized disputed-funds route applies.
Does an oral objection count, or must the dispute be in writing?
The hold rule covers either a written dispute or the broker's actual knowledge that a party contests or disagrees with the anticipated disbursement. A direct oral objection can supply actual knowledge. The broker cannot ignore it just because a preferred form has not arrived.
How are disputed earnest-money funds eventually released?
Rule 1450.750(h) provides the applicable all-party written release, civil-action/court-deposit and qualified unclaimed-property routes. A competent court order must be followed. The statutory Treasurer route has conditions; the money does not become the broker's or a party's property merely because time passes. Keep the records and obtain appropriate legal guidance for the actual process.
Does buyer default automatically let the seller keep the deposit and collect more damages?
No. Examine default, notice, cure and remedy terms and the enforceability of any liquidated-damages provision. In the published Berggren v. Hill opinion, the court applied the particular earnest-money clause as liquidated damages and rejected additional actual damages. The seller's resale also made the requested specific performance unavailable. The court recognized the penalty analysis; it did not hold that every deposit clause is enforceable or authorize brokers to decide disputed payouts.
Can a broker keep an authorized refund until a commission claim is paid?
No. The broker cannot use an authorized escrow disbursement as leverage for compensation. That does not prohibit a separately authorized earned-commission disbursement under the rule. A fee claim alone is not permission to retain or take the fund. The broker remains responsible even when a vendor handles the money.
Can an unlicensed assistant handle earnest money or decide its release?
Rule 1450.740(b)(9) permits recording and depositing earnest money, security deposits and rents at the designated managing broker's direction and approval. That does not authorize contract interpretation, negotiations or independent dispute decisions. Rule 1450.750 also limits delegation of escrow bookkeeping to a new broker who has not completed the 45-hour post-license education; ultimate responsibility remains with the sponsoring broker.
How long must Illinois broker escrow records be kept?
Rule 1450.755 requires the specified escrow records for five years, with separate office/access rules for recent and older records. Monthly reconciliation generally is due within ten days after receiving the bank statement, except the stated no-transactional-activity situation. Each reconciliation has an express five-year period from the last day of its covered month. Do not invent one closing-date retention clock for every record.
Are these actual PSI questions or approval of an escrow dispute?
No. The scenarios are original teaching questions. The source review covers the identified broker rules and published opinion, not an actual contract, disputed default, legal remedy, title-holder procedure or bank payment status. A short practice score is not a validated passing prediction.
Keep practising
Your next practice step
Put contracts into practice
Check formation, status and the parties' obligations before choosing a remedy.
These web resources are free. The app has a separate free starter tier and optional paid full access.
Official sources and scope
Checked October 25, 2026 against the identified Illinois broker provisions, the adopted escrow amendments and the published Berggren opinion. Earlier actual primary readings are identified in the review. The court discussion uses the opinion itself, not an unpublished order as controlling authority. All examples are original, and the closing calculation uses the stated simplified assumptions rather than approving an actual settlement or dispute.
- PSI June 24, 2026: national V.B.2 and Illinois II.I, II.K
- Illinois Courts contract instructions: foundational contract concepts
- 225 ILCS 454/20-20(a)(16)-(17), (22), (39): accounting, separation and release conditions
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.750: escrow, transfers, release, records and supervision
- Illinois Register, July 18, 2025, adopted escrow rule, printed 9581-9589
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.755(a)(1)-(2): escrow records and retention
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1450.740(b)(9), (c)-(d): assistant money tasks and limits
- Berggren v. Hill, 401 Ill. App. 3d 475 (2010): earnest money and liquidated damages
This is exam preparation, not advice for a specific transaction. State law and the applicable facts control. Our editorial and corrections process explains how to report an issue.